BOOK THIS SPACE FOR AD
ARTICLE ADBefore diving into advanced techniques, let’s briefly review the basics of CSRF. The vulnerability occurs when:
A user is authenticated on a web application (e.g., through a cookie).The user visits a malicious website or clicks on a link crafted by an attacker.The attacker sends a forged request to the web application using the user’s authentication credentials.This results in an unintended action on the target website, such as changing account settings, making a purchase, or transferring funds.
For CSRF to be successful, the application must rely on the user’s authentication, typically through cookies or other session identifiers, without proper verification.
A basic CSRF attack follows this sequence:
Authentication: The victim logs into a web application, receiving an authentication token (e.g., via cookies or session).Malicious Payload: The attacker crafts a malicious payload (e.g., an HTML form or JavaScript) that will trigger an action on the target web application.Execution: The victim unknowingly visits the attacker’s site, which automatically sends the forged request (e.g., using an image, form submission, or AJAX).Action Performed: The target web application processes the request as if it were made by the authenticated user, executing the action.The effectiveness of CSRF depends on the lack of additional safeguards like anti-CSRF tokens or SameSite cookie attributes.
Here are some advanced CSRF techniques that can be used to exploit or bypass basic protections:
CSRF Using Image Tags (Simple CSRF)
One of the simplest methods of exploiting CSRF is by embedding a request within an <img> tag. Since image requests are commonly made via GET, they can be used to trigger actions on the target web application.
Example:👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
<img src=”https://target-website.com/delete_account?user=attacker" style=”display:none;”>
The victim’s browser will send a GET request to the target website, causing the intended action to be performed.
CSRF Using JavaScript (AJAX-based CSRF)
JavaScript can be used to make more complex requests, such as POST or PUT. This method allows attackers to send data to the web server, including form data, without the user’s knowledge.
Example: 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.open(“POST”, “https://target-website.com/transfer-funds", true);
xhr.setRequestHeader(“Content-Type”, “application/x-www-form-urlencoded”);
xhr.send(“amount=1000&recipient=attacker_account”);
This technique is particularly powerful because it can handle complex requests, like submitting forms or making API calls.
CSRF with Flash or WebSockets
Older applications may use Flash or WebSockets to communicate with the backend. Attackers can exploit these technologies by embedding malicious Flash objects or WebSocket connections in the victim’s browser, resulting in the execution of malicious requests.
Example of Flash payload:👇👇👇👇
<embed src=”http://attacker.com/malicious.swf" />
This approach is less common today but still exists in legacy applications.
CSRF with File Uploads
Some applications allow file uploads, and if these endpoints are not properly protected, attackers can exploit them via CSRF. By crafting a request to upload malicious files, attackers could gain access to sensitive areas of the application or compromise the server.
Anti-CSRF Tokens
Many modern web applications implement anti-CSRF tokens that are unique to each user session. These tokens are included in forms and validated on the server side to ensure that the request is coming from a legitimate source.
However, advanced attackers can sometimes bypass this protection using the following techniques:
Token Guessing: Some applications use weak random tokens that can be predicted.Token Leakage: If tokens are stored insecurely (e.g., in cookies or URLs), attackers can retrieve them and use them in a malicious request.SameSite Cookies
Setting the SameSite attribute on cookies can prevent browsers from sending authentication cookies with cross-site requests. While this is an excellent defense mechanism, attackers can still bypass it using the following methods:
Subdomain Attacks: If SameSite is set to Strict, subdomains may still bypass this restriction.Browser Vulnerabilities: Some browsers may not fully implement or enforce SameSite rules.Referer Header Validation
Some applications check the Referer header to validate the origin of requests. While this is an effective protection method, it is not foolproof:
Referer Spoofing: Some browsers allow users to spoof or omit the Referer header.CORS Misconfigurations: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) misconfigurations can allow malicious sites to bypass Referer checks.To identify CSRF vulnerabilities in a web application, follow these steps:
Check for Sensitive Actions: Identify actions such as password changes, money transfers, or account deletions that should be protected against CSRF.Verify the Presence of Anti-CSRF Tokens: Ensure that all forms and state-changing requests contain anti-CSRF tokens and that these tokens are validated on the server side.Test for SameSite Cookies: Check if cookies are marked with the SameSite attribute to prevent cross-origin requests.Monitor Referer Headers: Ensure that the Referer header is correctly validated and corresponds to the target domain.Use Automated Tools: Leverage automated vulnerability scanners like Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, or CSRFTester to identify potential CSRF issues.Reconnaissance:
Map out the target application, identifying all endpoints that change state (e.g., user profile changes, money transfers).Look for authentication mechanisms, session cookies, or API keys.Testing for CSRF:
Try submitting a GET request with parameters embedded in an image or iframe tag.Attempt to send a POST request via JavaScript or an HTML form.Test for the absence of anti-CSRF tokens or weak token mechanisms.Exploitation:
Create a malicious payload that sends a forged request to a target endpoint.Test if the victim’s browser sends the request with the correct session or authentication token.Post-Exploitation:
Once you gain access to a vulnerable endpoint, attempt to perform more complex actions, such as transferring funds, changing account settings, or exploiting file upload vulnerabilities.To mitigate CSRF risks, here are the most effective defense mechanisms:
Use Anti-CSRF Tokens: Implement unique, unpredictable tokens for every form and state-changing request.Apply SameSite Cookies: Set the SameSite attribute on cookies to Strict or Lax.Validate Referer Headers: Ensure that requests come from trusted origins.Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Require additional authentication steps for sensitive actions to prevent unauthorized requests.Use HTTP Security Headers: Implement headers like X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy to reduce the attack surface.To understand the impact of CSRF vulnerabilities in real-world scenarios, let’s review a few case studies and examples where CSRF has been successfully exploited:
GitHub CSRF Vulnerability (2015)
In 2015, a security researcher discovered a CSRF vulnerability in GitHub’s settings page. By exploiting the vulnerability, an attacker could change a user’s email address to an attacker-controlled address. This attack was successful because GitHub’s application did not verify the Referer header or include an anti-CSRF token in the request. Although this vulnerability was patched, it demonstrates how even well-known platforms can fall victim to CSRF if security measures are not thoroughly implemented.
Takeaway: Always validate headers and include anti-CSRF tokens for sensitive actions such as email or password changes.
Online Banking CSRF (Hypothetical Case)
Imagine an online banking application where users can transfer funds between accounts. If the application does not protect against CSRF, an attacker could craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated user, would trigger a money transfer request using the user’s authentication cookie. This attack could result in unauthorized transactions, potentially leading to significant financial losses.
Defense Mechanism: Ensure that state-changing actions like fund transfers have anti-CSRF tokens and additional protections like two-factor authentication (2FA).
Single-page applications (SPAs) are becoming more prevalent, and CSRF attacks in SPAs require additional attention due to their unique architecture. SPAs typically rely on AJAX for data communication, which could lead to potential CSRF risks if not properly handled.
Handling CSRF with JavaScript Frameworks
Most modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.js make use of REST APIs or GraphQL. In the case of CSRF, we must ensure the following:
Authentication: Authentication tokens should be stored securely (e.g., in HTTP-only cookies) and passed along with every request using Authorization headers.Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS): Proper CORS configurations should be in place to prevent unauthorized sites from making requests to the API.JWTs vs Cookies: For SPAs using JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), ensure that tokens are stored in a secure manner (preferably in memory, not in local storage), as storage in local storage can expose the token to XSS vulnerabilities.CSRF in AJAX Requests
When making AJAX requests in SPAs, ensure that the server checks for CSRF tokens, and make sure that cookies are configured with the SameSite attribute to mitigate cross-origin attacks.
Example:👇👇👇👇👇
// Example of sending a POST request with an anti-CSRF token in an SPA
const csrfToken = getCsrfTokenFromMetaTag();
fetch(‘https://target-site.com/api/update-profile', {
method: ‘POST’,
headers: {
‘Content-Type’: ‘application/json’,
‘CSRF-Token’: csrfToken // Anti-CSRF token
},
body: JSON.stringify({ name: ‘New Name’ })
});
In SPAs, the use of AJAX calls introduces an additional layer of complexity, and CSRF protection mechanisms must ensure that tokens are correctly sent with requests.
Advanced detection of CSRF vulnerabilities often goes beyond the simple search for forms or API endpoints that could be exploited. Here are some in-depth strategies for detecting CSRF vulnerabilities:
Burp Suite CSRF Scanner
Burp Suite is one of the most popular web application security testing tools and has a built-in CSRF scanner. Here’s how to use it effectively:
Spidering the Application: First, use Burp’s spider to crawl the application and capture every request made during the interaction.Identifying Vulnerable Endpoints: Once the application is mapped, use the CSRF scanner to detect endpoints that are vulnerable to CSRF. Burp will identify whether anti-CSRF tokens are included and if cookies are set with the SameSite attribute.Testing Automated Payloads: Burp can also automatically generate and test CSRF payloads to check for vulnerable endpoints.OWASP ZAP CSRF Detection
OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) also provides functionality to detect CSRF vulnerabilities. Like Burp Suite, it can scan for endpoints missing CSRF tokens and identify those that are vulnerable to exploitation.
ZAP offers Passive Scanning and Active Scanning for CSRF:
Passive Scanning: This automatically checks requests and responses while you interact with the application.Active Scanning: This involves sending crafted requests (including CSRF attempts) to test the application.Manual Testing for Anti-CSRF Tokens
While automated tools are effective, manual testing can help you find more subtle CSRF vulnerabilities. Here’s a step-by-step process for testing manually:
Identify Sensitive Actions: Look for actions that change data (password change, financial transactions, etc.).Examine Forms and Headers: Check for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens in form fields or HTTP headers.Modify and Test Requests: Manually modify requests by removing or modifying tokens and observing whether the application processes the request.Test SameSite Cookies: Use tools like curl or browser developer tools to test how the application handles cookies when making cross-origin requests.CSRF vulnerabilities can be much more sophisticated than basic exploitation. Here are some advanced attack scenarios where attackers can leverage CSRF for higher-impact exploits:
CSRF with JSON Web Tokens (JWTs)
JWTs have become the go-to solution for handling authentication in modern applications, but if not properly configured, they are prone to CSRF attacks.
In some cases, JWTs are stored in local storage, which prevents them from being automatically sent with requests. However, if JWTs are stored in cookies and the SameSite attribute is not set, attackers can exploit this through CSRF.
Exploitation Example:
Imagine a scenario where an application uses JWTs in cookies to authenticate users. The attacker crafts a malicious form or JavaScript that sends a request to an API endpoint using the user’s authentication cookie, which contains the JWT token. If the request is not properly protected by an anti-CSRF token, the attacker could perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim.
Defense:
Always use SameSite cookies to prevent cross-origin leaks.Implement additional validation to ensure that JWTs are only passed over secure channels (e.g., using HTTP headers).CSRF in WebSocket Connections
WebSocket connections are commonly used in modern web applications for real-time communication. However, WebSockets are susceptible to CSRF-like attacks if session cookies are sent with requests over unprotected WebSocket channels.
If an attacker can convince a victim to visit a malicious site while authenticated on a vulnerable application, they could initiate WebSocket connections and send malicious data, causing unwanted actions such as altering real-time messages, posting data, or affecting communication.
Defense:
Ensure WebSocket connections are secured via WebSocket Secure (wss://) and authenticate each connection using token-based mechanisms or headers.Implement strict validation to prevent unauthorized WebSocket communication.CSRF via Iframe Injection (Clickjacking)
Although primarily an attack vector for Clickjacking, iframe injection can also be leveraged for CSRF attacks, particularly when the target application fails to enforce proper protections against framing.
In this scenario, attackers could embed the target website’s page in an invisible iframe, and upon a user interacting with the malicious site, an action could be silently executed on the target site without the user’s consent.
For example, an attacker could place an invisible iframe on their site that loads a page from a banking application, which causes an unauthorized fund transfer when the victim clicks anywhere on the page.
Defense:
Use the X-Frame-Options header or Content-Security-Policy (CSP) to prevent your application from being embedded in iframes.Implement clickjacking defenses by ensuring sensitive actions can’t be triggered through hidden iframes.CSRF in File Uploads and Remote Code Execution
Another advanced scenario is exploiting file upload functionality through CSRF, especially in applications that allow file uploads (e.g., images, documents). In this case, attackers could combine CSRF with remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities by crafting malicious file uploads (e.g., PHP, JSP, or other executable formats).
The attacker can forge a request to upload a file to a server, and if the server improperly validates the uploaded file’s type or size, it could execute the malicious file, granting the attacker a foothold on the server.
Defense:
Always validate and sanitize files uploaded by users, ensuring only allowed file types are accepted.Use content filtering and proper file scanning mechanisms to ensure that uploaded files do not contain malicious codeImagine a scenario where you’re testing an online shopping website that allows users to change their shipping address. After logging in, a user might submit an address change form via a POST request:
<form action=”https://onlineshop.com/checkout/change-address" method=”POST”>
<input type=”text” name=”address” value=”attacker’s address”>
<input type=”submit” value=”Change Address”>
</form>
If the website does not implement CSRF protections such as tokens or SameSite cookies, an attacker could simply host this form on a malicious site and trick the user into submitting it.
An attacker could also use JavaScript to submit the form invisibly, ensuring the victim is unaware of the action:
var form = document.createElement(‘form’);
form.method = ‘POST’;
form.action = ‘https://onlineshop.com/checkout/change-address';
var input = document.createElement(‘input’);
input.name = ‘address’;
input.value = ‘attacker’s address’;
form.appendChild(input);
document.body.appendChild(form);
form.submit();
If successful, the attacker has hijacked the user’s order and redirected it to an address of their choosing, all without the victim’s knowledge.