BOOK THIS SPACE FOR AD
ARTICLE ADPenetration Testing in other words is Ethical Hacking. It is the practical process of finding or exploring the vulnerabilities within a system, network, web application, or IoT that attacker could exploit. There are several leading pen testing methodologies, each with their own approach, scope and areas of focus. here is the comprehensive guide;
Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual (OSSTMM)
The Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual (OSSTMM) is peer-reviewed and maintained by the Institute for Security and Open Methodologies (ISECOM). It has been primarily developed as a security auditing methodology assessing against regulatory and industry requirements.
Some key aspects of the OSSTMM include:
Operational focus: Goes beyond just identifying technical vulnerabilities by also testing operational processes, physical security, human elements, wireless security, telecommunications, etc. Provides a holistic view of an organization’s security posture.
Channel testing: Analyzing the communication channels into and out of an organization, such as Bluetooth, WiFi, telephone, VoIP, SMS, email, web, etc.
Metrics and measurements: The OSSTMM introduced the idea of using scientific measurements and metrics as part of the testing process. This enables quantitative analysis rather than just pass/fail assessment.
Trust analysis: Evaluation of how much the penetration test target can be trusted to maintain its security properties based on operational controls.
Attack surface: Identification of the different points where an attacker can try to enter data or extract data from a system.
Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES)
The Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES) is a framework designed to serve as a standard for performing penetration testing. It was developed by a group of security experts to provide a repeatable and consistent methodology for testing.
The key elements of PTES include:
Pre-engagement: Establishing rules of engagement, testing scope, communication mechanisms, and legal approval.
Intelligence gathering: Identifying the target organization’s online presence, domain names, IP blocks, employee names/emails, and technologies used.
Threat modeling: Creating models describing how attackers could penetrate the system and cause damage. Used to guide and focus the testing.
Vulnerability analysis: Discovering and analyzing technical vulnerabilities like OS, network, and application weaknesses. Assessing vulnerability severity.
Exploitation: Attempting to gain access to systems through penetration techniques like password cracking, social engineering, and denial of service attacks.
Post exploitation: Extracting data from compromised systems, maintaining access, covering tracks, pivoting to other systems.
Reporting: Documenting discoveries, vulnerabilities, exploited systems, findings analysis, and recommended mitigation strategies.
OWASP Testing Guide
The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) is an open-source organization focused on improving web application security. OWASP maintains a comprehensive Testing Guide that outlines a methodology for testing the security of web apps.
Some key aspects of the OWASP Testing Guide:
Web-focused: Covers vulnerabilities and risks specific to web applications such as injection attacks, broken authentication, sensitive data exposure, cross-site scripting (XSS), broken access control, and security misconfigurations.
Technology agnostic: Applicable to web apps built on any technology or framework like Java, .NET, PHP, Node.js, Python, etc. Also covers APIs and web services.
Eight main principles: Define key principles including understanding the full scope of the app, proper staging & test data, appropriate access authorization, and reporting findings responsibly.
Four main phases: Information Gathering, threat assessment, Vulnerability Analysis, and Custom Code Review.
18 Test Types: Provides a methodology for specific test types like identity management, business logic, authentication, session management, input validation, and more.
EC-Council’s Licensed Penetration Tester (LPT)
The Licensed Penetration Tester (LPT) methodology by EC-Council is a structured framework for conducting advanced penetration testing. It follows a step-by-step process to ensure that every aspect of a target system is examined for vulnerabilities, potential exploits, and security weaknesses. This methodology focuses on providing a thorough, ethical, and legally compliant approach to penetration testing.
Some key aspects of the EC-Council’s Licensed Penetration Tester (LPT) Guide:
Comprehensive Vulnerability Identification: The LPT methodology ensures that all potential attack vectors are systematically explored, leading to the identification of known and unknown vulnerabilities in systems, applications, and networks.
Thorough Risk Assessment: By following this structured methodology, testers can evaluate and prioritize the risks associated with identified vulnerabilities based on their exploitability and potential business impact. This enables organizations to address the most critical risks first.
Actionable Recommendations: The outcome includes detailed, actionable remediation steps for each vulnerability, providing organizations with a clear path to improving their security posture. This could include patching, system hardening, or procedural changes.
Compliance and Regulatory Adherence: The LPT methodology helps organizations meet regulatory requirements such as PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, GDPR, or other industry-specific compliance standards. The detailed reports generated from the methodology can serve as proof of security testing efforts.
Professional, Ethical Testing: Testers who follow the LPT methodology adhere to a strict ethical code, ensuring that testing is carried out in a manner that protects client systems from harm. This reduces the risk of downtime, data loss, or other negative impacts during testing.
Realistic Attack Simulations: The methodology incorporates real-world attack scenarios, simulating the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) of actual adversaries. This provides a more realistic assessment of the organization’s resilience to cyberattacks.